Chic Chicago

I went to Chicago for the first time last week to visit my sister Elycia. It was an amazing trip, with way too many good things to blog about-- but a highlight was going to the Chicago History Museum.

HEY!  Before you yawn and navigate away from this page, hear me out.  This museum was awesome—small enough to be digestible, and full enough to be fascinating.  The permanent collection includes the bed in which Abraham Lincoln died and an original waitress’ outfit from the first Playboy Club—dangerous AND sexy!

I particularly loved the “Chic Chicago” exhibit, which runs through July 26th 2009. It’s a collection of more than 60 couture outfits worn by Chicago society women from 1861 to 2004, and I would highly recommend it to anyone, regardless of his or her interest in fashion. It's a remarkably well put-together exhibit, and chock full of interesting information about the outfits on display and the women who wore them.



A gown designed by Madeleine Vionnet; worn by Mrs. Potter Palmer II  when she was presented to the Queen of England in 1938.


A gown (that weighs 17 pounds!) designed by Charles James and known as the "Butterfly"; Worn by Mrs. John V. Farwell III in 1954.

The coolest part about Chic Chicago was the installation's design: The gallery walls had large photos of Chicago’s factories and slaughterhouses with superimposed quotations from prominent 19th and 20th century writers about the seedy, gritty nature of the city.  Basically, the exhibit's organizers acknowledged that the enormous wealth that makes couture clothes available to certain people is often built on the backs of others who aren’t living in such charmed environs.  I thought that it was a brave and very responsible way to frame the exhibit.

We weren't allowed to take photos in the gallery, but I found a couple from the exhibit's opening soiree posted online (here and here you can see the photos and quotations I mentioned.)  I wonder if the socialites in the foreground of these photos were inspired at all by the exhibit's background to think about where their own clothes came from?
Comments
By marylig0050 at 10:05 p.m. Sept. 11, 2026
XEvil 5.0 automatically solve most kind of captchas,
Including such type of captchas: ReCaptcha v.2, ReCaptcha v.3, Google, Solve Media, BitcoinFaucet, Steam, +12k
+ hCaptcha, FC, ReCaptcha Enterprize now supported in new XEvil 6.0!
+ CloudFlare TurnsTile, GeeTest captcha now supported in new XEvil 7.0!
+ XEvil 7.0 was released! ReCaptcha v2 solving speed increased x2!
+ XEvil can solve captchas from OpenClaw AI bot!

1.) Fast, easy, precisionly
XEvil is the fastest captcha killer in the world. Its has no solving limits, no threads number limits

2.) Several APIs support
XEvil supports more than 6 different, worldwide known API: 2captcha, anti-captchas (antigate), rucaptcha, DeathByCaptcha, etc.
just send your captcha via HTTP request, as you can send into any of that service - and XEvil will solve your captcha!
So, XEvil is compatible with hundreds of applications for SEO/SMM/password recovery/parsing/posting/clicking/cryptocurrency/etc.

3.) Useful support and manuals
After purchase, you got access to a private tech.support forum, Wiki, Skype/Telegram online support
Developers will train XEvil to your type of captcha for FREE and very fast - just send them examples

4.) How to get free trial use of XEvil full version?
- Try to search in Google "Home of XEvil"
- you will find IPs with opened port 80 of XEvil users (click on any IP to ensure)
- try to send your captcha via 2captcha API ino one of that IPs
- if you got BAD KEY error, just tru another IP
- enjoy! :)
- (its not work for hCaptcha!)

WARNING: Free XEvil DEMO does NOT support ReCaptcha, hCaptcha and most other types of captcha!

By marcotag at 8:04 p.m. Sept. 18, 2026
Сторінка <a href=https://moireceptimultivarki.space/>ресурс «Мультиварка. Рецепти»</a> – це незамінний для українців сайт та понад 120 стійкими стравами для приготування в мультиварці. Тут представлені покрокові рецепти з покроковим описом для перших страв, м'ясних делікатесів, випічки, гарнірів із круп, рагу, запіканок, припущених овочів, філе, котлет, риби з овочами і десертів. Основна відмінність – це увага до комфорту: поклав продукти в чашу, виставив налаштування — і все виходить. Більшість страв виходять з невеликою кількістю олії, результат приготування гарантований для всіх, незалежно від рівня. Постійно з'являються нові оновлення (наприклад рисовий хліб та пиріг з полуницею на пісковому тісті), є змога підписатися на оновлення.
By oliverdeme at 12:30 a.m. Oct. 7, 2026
I am trying to work out my undertone before choosing a few new clothes, but the phone camera gives me a different answer almost every time. Under a warm bulb my face looks golden; by the window it looks cooler. The mirror seems more consistent, though I know nearby walls and clothing can cast color too. I would like to make one repeatable comparison rather than collect more screenshots. My plan is to use indirect daylight, remove makeup, keep the same camera settings, and hold two fabrics close to my face in the same place. I would look for changes in redness, shadows, and how clear my eyes appear. Is that a fair way to compare? I am especially unsure whether a plain white background helps or simply makes the phone adjust its exposure again. If I take pictures, I would also keep the reference fabric in each frame so I can compare them later. I looked through an explanation of <a href=https://findhairstyle.top>skin tone analysis</a> while learning the vocabulary, but I would rather check the conditions of the test than trust a single label from an image. If you have done this at home, which steps made the difference easiest to see? I am happy to run the comparison twice. I mainly want a usable observation. I can keep a note of the light in each comparison. I would welcome specific advice.
New comment